Evaluation of the Advanced Placement Program in Environmental Science Год выпуска: 2011Автор: Rebecca CooperИздательство: LAP Lambert Academic PublishingСтраниц: 188ISBN: 9783845475080Описание Stakeholders’ perceptions of the Advanced Placement Program in Environmental Science (APES) in California, Florida, and New York were evaluated. Research questions focused on teacher and student profiles, attitudes toward APES, the effect of gender and ethnicity on attitudes, differences in self-report data by teachers and students, strengths and weaknesses of APES, and a match between implementation and the guidelines of the College Board. Twelve teachers and 355 students completed attitude surveys, and 10 students and one teacher were interviewed. The teacher and student survey data identified fieldwork and class discussions as important strengths of APES classes and insufficient field and lab work as the most significant weakness. Teachers reportedly did not follow many of the APES guidelines identified by the College Board, including: offering one lab a week and spending a significant amount of time doing fieldwork and working on environmental problems. To improve the APES...
Похожие книги
Financial Correspondents of the New York Times. The New Rules of Personal Investing: The Experts' Guide to Prospering in a Changing Economy. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Mordechai Elihau Kreinin, Anniversary Conference of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement 1998 m. Building a Partnership: The Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Herbert W. Nickens, Adrienne Y. Stith, Lois Colburn, Clyde H. Evans, Brian D. Smedley, Institute of Medicine, Symposium on Diversity in Health Professions in Honor of Herbert W. Ni. The Right Thing to Do, The Smart Thing to Do: Enhancing Diversity in the Health Professions. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. K. Alec Chrystal, Rupert Pennant-Rea, British Association for the Advancement of Science Section F. Public Choice Analysis of Economic Policy (British Association for the Advancement of Science Books). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Graham Pyatt, M. Ward, G. Pyatt, Michael Ward, Frederick Morton State of the Poor Eden. Identifying the Poor. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Garth L. Mangum, Stephen L. Mangum, Andrew M. Sum, Andrew Sum, Sar A. Programs in Aid of the Poor Levitan. The Persistence of Poverty in the United States. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Dag Harald Claes, Dag Harald Claes ARENA: Advanced Research on the Europeanisation of the Nation-State. The Politics of Oil-Producer Cooperation. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. International Conference on Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and, Hans-Peter Weikard, Robert D. Weaver, Justus Wesseler. Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Mike Parnwell, Raymond L. Bryant, Michael J. G. Parnwell, Association of South-East Asian Studies in the United Kingdom. Environmental Change in South-East Asia: People, Politics and Sustainable Development (Global Environmental Change Series). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Leadership The Center For Army, Army Department of the. The U.S. Army Leadership Field Manual. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Political Economy of the World-System Conference 2001 Virginia Polyte. Emerging Issues in the 21st Century World-System (Contributions in Economics and Economic History, No. 230). – М.: , 2003. – 0 с. State of the Art of Research in International Marketing Conference. Handbook of Research in International Marketing. – М.: , 2003. – 0 с. Committee on Scientific Use of the Radio Spectrum, Committee on Radio Frequencies, National Research. Spectrum Management for Science in the 21st Century. – М.: , 2010. – 160 с. CAPT(Center for the Advancement of Process Tech)l. Process Quality. – М.: , 2010. – 288 с. The Run of the. The Run of the House. – М.: , 1993. – 0 с. The Legal Advisory Panel of the Aviation Working Group. Advanced Contract and Opinion Practices under the Cape Town Convention. – М.: , 2011. – 76 с. Match of the Day Magazine. Match of the Day Annual 2013 (Annuals 2013). – М.: , 2012. – 96 с. Образцы работ
Задайте свой вопрос по вашей теме
Контакты
Поделиться
Мы в социальных сетях
Реклама
Отзывы
Антон Здравствуйте, спасибо за исправленную работу после вашего сопровождения. Получил рецензию на работу после вашего сопровождения: материал изложенный в работе может быть оценен положительно, но мне необходимо к защите подготовить ответ на вопрос: каковы формы взаимодействия органов безопасности и др государственных органов, входящих в механизм государства! могли бы вы мне помочь в этой прблеме. И уточнить благодарность за повторную работу и будущую небольшую подсказку)). Заранее спасибо. С уважением Антон!
