Competition for Public Transport Services: Institutional Framework and Empirical Evidence of Bus Services in Germany (Contributions to Economics) Год выпуска: 2012Автор: Arne BeckИздательство: Страниц: 261ISBN: 3790828017Описание This book evaluates the successes, failures, and factors that influence the competition for public bus transport services. Using Germany as a case study, the author explains the dichotomous system of a market with licenses for commercial services, where operators are granted exclusivity, and licenses for non-commercial services, where supplementary direct subsidies are tendered out by public transport authorities. The empirical analysis is based on primary data usually not publicly available, and supplemented by numerous expert interviews. The book aims to provide a basic understanding of the players and their options, offer insights into the German model, and make policy recommendations for those whose goal is to increase competition.
Похожие книги
Arne Beck. Competition for Public Transport Services: Institutional Framework and Empirical Evidence of Bus Services in Germany (Contributions to Economics). – М.: , 2012. – 261 с. Kevin A. Hassett, R. Glenn Hubbard, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Transition Costs of Fundamental Tax Reform. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Maryann P. Feldman, Albert N. Link, Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy (Economics of Science, Technology, and Innovation, V. 23). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Dahlem Workshop on Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation 2002, Peter Hammerstein. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation (Dahlem Workshop Reports.). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Mark V. Pauly, Bradley Herring, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Cutting Taxes for Insuring: Options and Effects of Tax Credits for Health Insurance (Aei Studies on Tax Reform). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Health and Safety Implications of Child Labor. Protecting Youth at Work: Health, Safety, and Development of Working Children and Adolescents in the United States. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Peter J. Wallison, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Serving Two Masters, Yet Out of Control: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Arch G. Woodside, G. I. Crouch, J. A. Mazanec, M. Oppermann, M. Y. Sakai, A. G. Woodside, Hospitality, and Leisure Society of Consumer Psychology of Tourism. Consumer Psychology of Tourism, Hospitality and Leisure. – М.: , 2000. – 387 с. Society for Marketing Professional Services. Marketing Handbook for the Design & Construction Professional: Society for Marketing Professional Services. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. American Society for Healthcare Central Services Professionals. Training Manual for Health Care Central Service Technicians (Jossey-Bass/Aha Press). – М.: , 2005. – 304 с. United Nations.Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Division for Public Administration and Dev. Public Enterprises: Unresolved Challenges and New Opportunities. – М.: , 2008. – 152 с. The Centre for Public Law at the University of Cambridge. Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom. – М.: , 2011. – 144 с. ICAA (The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia). Financial Reporting Handbook 2008. – М.: , 2008. – 0 с. ICAA (The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia). Financial Reporting Handbook 2010. – М.: , 2010. – 1992 с. ICAA (The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia). Auditing and Assurance Handbook 2010. – М.: , 2010. – 0 с. Jaya Kumara and KHAISER NIKAM. Attitudes of Young Adults towards Public Library Services in Karnataka. – М.: Scholars' Press, 2014. – 272 с. Ayanda Vilakazi and Krishna K. Govender. An Overview of Public Transport Services In Johannesburg South Africa. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2014. – 152 с. Образцы работ
Задайте свой вопрос по вашей теме
Контакты
Поделиться
Мы в социальных сетях
Реклама
Отзывы
Екатерина, 16.02 Примите искренние слова благодарности за тот труд, который вы проделали. Работа замечательная! Мне очень понравилась! Защита прошла прекрасно, я получила 4 и то только потому, что не уложилась в регламент с докладом. Вы и Ваша команда - просто молодцы! Желаю Вам всего самого доброго! Удачи! Счастливо!
