Acoustic Emission Evaluation of RC beams and Bridges Год выпуска: 2010Автор: Archana Nair and Dr.Steve C.S.CaiИздательство: LAP Lambert Academic PublishingСтраниц: 92ISBN: 9783838309859Описание A considerable proportion of highway bridges in the US, are made of reinforced concrete. Since there is a need to detect and recuperate the condition of the bridge structures numerous innovative non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques have come into the forefront. Of the many available technologies, acoustic emission (AE) monitoring has been the most popular passive non-destructive technique used on highway bridges. Usually AE monitoring is used to obtain qualitative results by observing the trends of the conventional AE parameters recorded by the data acquisition system. In this book, damage is quantified by applying the intensity analysis technique to conventional AE parameters generated from reinforced concrete members subjected to certain loads.
Похожие книги
Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. International Co-Operation in Tax Matters: Report of the As Hoc Group of Experts on International Co-Operation in Tax Matters on the Work of Its 1st. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Robin Turrell, World Bank South Asia Region Rural Development Sector Unit, India Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment, Great Britain Dept. for International Development. Urban Water Supply and Sanitation (South Asia Rural Development Series). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. M. Fogiel, Staff of Rea, Research and Education Association, Research, The Staff of Education Association. Microeconomics Super Review. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Frank Ackerman, David Kiron, Neva R. Goodwin, Jonathan M. Harris, Kevin P. Gallagher, Program for the Study of Sustainable Change and Development. Human Well-Being and Economic Goals (Frontier Issues in Economic Thought, Vol 3). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. M. Fogiel, Staff of Rea, Research and Education Association. Basic Electricity. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Mordechai E. Kreinin, Institute of International Economics and Management. Contemporary Issues in Commercial Policy. – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Laura Randall, Columbia University University Seminars, Columbia University Institute of Latin American and Iberian Studies. Reforming Mexico's Agrarian Reform (Columbia University Seminar Series). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Institute of World Economy and Politics. China: An Economics Research Study Series Trading With The Dragon (An Economics Research Study Series). – М.: , 2005. – 118 с. Research Program on the Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS and Health. A Comparative Analysis of the Financing of HIV/AIDS Programs: in Botswana, Lesotho, Mozambique, South Africa, Swaziland and Zimbabwe. – М.: , 2005. – 72 с. Environmental, and Other External Costs and Benefits of Energy Production and Consumption Committee. Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use. – М.: , 2010. – 506 с. Dana Wallace, International Guidelines Center, American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology an. Rhinitis GUIDELINES Pocketcard: American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. – М.: , 2010. – 14 с. Joaquim Casal. Evaluation of the Effects and Consequences of Major Accidents in Industrial Plants,8. – М.: , 2010. – 378 с. The Editors of Hamptons Cottages and Gardens. Hamptons Havens : The Best of Hamptons Cottages and Gardens. – М.: Bulfinch, 2005. – 192 с. Archana Nair and Dr.Steve C.S.Cai. Acoustic Emission Evaluation of RC beams and Bridges. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010. – 92 с. Hasan Nikopour. Behaviour of RC beams retrofitted/repaired in shear with FRP. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013. – 132 с. Richard Nti. Evaluation of Information Education and Communication on Child Health. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012. – 100 с. Amiya K. Samanta and Prof. Somnath Ghosh. A 3D Hypoelastic Model of RC Structure using lower order EAS elements. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011. – 260 с. Образцы работ
Задайте свой вопрос по вашей теме
Контакты
Поделиться
Мы в социальных сетях
Реклама
Отзывы
Алексей Здравствуйте, нам выставили оценки за курсовые за обе курсовые нам поставили 4 при защите, ей видимо в курсовой просто не понравилось негативное отношение к оценщикам, поэтому она и поставила такие оценки, а в переделанной работе это все было убрано и она поставила более высокие оценки, а по банковскому делу поставили 5. Так что все хорошо. Спасибо большое!
