Theory and Background for Systemic Worker Motivation Год выпуска: 2012Автор: Joseph HaefnerИздательство: LAP Lambert Academic PublishingСтраниц: 148ISBN: 9783659228346Описание Since Max Weber, scholars have been trying to understand the mechanisms affecting worker motivation. Various negative and positive reinforcement has been tried from Theory X and Theory Y to Maslow's Theory Z. Yet worker productivity varies greatly and managers are often frustrated by their inability to get more work from workers. Scholars have published a great variety of theory and there have been calls for an overarching construct to unify all of those theories. None have been forthcoming. A solution may lie in open systems theory - recognition that all of the theories are bound and subject to the principles of open systems theory as described by Skyttner, von Bertalanffy, and Laszlo. This book examines open systems theory principles and describes how they apply in organizations. In addition, a case study shows how these principles came into play such that workers broke production records in a U.S. manufacturing plant.
Похожие книги
Bob Johansen and Institute for the Future. Get There Early: Sensing the Future to Compete in the Present. – М.: , 2012. – 408 с. Michael D. McGinnis, Bloomington Workshop in Political Theory and polic Indiana University. Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (Institutional Analysis). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Michael D. McGinnis, Bloomington Workshop in Political Theory and polic Indiana University. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (Institutional Analysis). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Committee on Prospects and Opportunities for Sustainable Management Of, National Research Council. Forested Landscapes in Perspective: Prospects and Opportunities for Sustainable Management of America's Nonfederal Forests (Agriculture). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics 1996 univ, Carl Chiarella, Steve Keen, Robert Marks, Hermann Schnabl. Commerce, Complexity, and Evolution: Topics in Economics, Finance, Marketing, and Management : Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium in E ... Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. Peter Checkland and Jim Scholes. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. – М.: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2005. – 424 с. John Mingers, Leslie P. Willcocks. Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (John Wiley Series in Information Systems). – М.: , 0. – 0 с. John Mingers. Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. – М.: , 2004. – 472 с. David G Gil. Confronting Injustice and Oppression – Concepts and Strategies for Social Workers. – М.: , 1998. – 178 с. Richard S. Figliola. Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements. – М.: , 1995. – 624 с. Anacostia Museum and Center For African American History and Culture. The Black Washingtonians. – М.: , 2005. – 400 с. Environmental Adult Education: Ecological Learning, Theory, and Practice for Socioenvironmental Change. – М.: , 2003. – 112 с. Atec and Xnet Information Systems. The Internet Watchdog Personal Edition Windows. – М.: , . – с. Zuoping Li and Heng Ban. A Novel Sensor and Corrosion Measurement System. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010. – 76 с. Joseph Haefner. Theory and Background for Systemic Worker Motivation. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012. – 148 с. Dalvinder Grewal. Theories and Models for Quality Management in Higher Education. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012. – 244 с. Jonathan Zilberg. A New Theory and Method for the Study of Tourist Art. – М.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011. – 108 с. Образцы работ
Задайте свой вопрос по вашей теме
Контакты
Поделиться
Мы в социальных сетях
Реклама
Отзывы
Павел Мой преподаватель, с которым я работаю уже несколько лет - под его руководством я писал дипломную работу, в прошлый раз, когда вы сопровождали мне курсовик по Инновационному менеджменту, был удивлён и крайне смущен моей работой. Он сказал, что она очень грамотно составлена и вообще выполнена на высоком уровне. Он высказал своё сомнение в том, что я делал её самостоятельно. Я наврал, что составил данную работу из нескольких кусков, найденных в интернете. :) Он поставил мне пятёрку, конечно, но по его поведению было видно, что делает он это не с чистой совестью, так что мне не хотелось бы излишне смущать своего преподавателя ещё раз :)
