Год выпуска: 2011 Автор: Basil Markesinis, Jean-Bernard Auby, Coester Waltjen and Simon Deakin Издательство: Страниц: 184 ISBN: 1841131245
Описание
In a number of important decisions such as Stovin v. Wise,X v. Bedfordshire, Barrett v. Enfield London Borough Council and others, English courts have been forced to grapple with the important issue of tortious liability of statutory bodies. Following the Hill decision, they opted for a wide non-liability rule on a variety of policy and economic efficiency grounds. Yet many of their arguments have been considered and rejected by both German and French courts when deciding factually equivalent situations. This study analyses five leading English cases in a comparative and economic way and questions the validity of their assumptions as well as their arguments in the light of the recent important decision of the Strasbourg Court of Human Rights in Osman v. UK. This thought-provoking book, written by two English academics from Oxford and Cambridge Universities, in collaboration with two leading authorities from the Universities of Paris and Munich, should provide food for thought...
Юлия, хочу поблагодарить за курсовик К работе никаких претензий нет. В готовом виде я ее сдавать не буду, а испльзую в качестве материала к диплому. (А то в нашем чудесном ВУЗе об организации и построении обследования никому ничего не известно).Так что спасибо за помощь!